MG IM6 Long Range vs Lexus NX 350h Hybrid AWD: which costs less to run?
In United States, the MG IM6 Long Range is cheaper to run than the Lexus NX 350h Hybrid AWD: about $6.23 per 100 mi versus $9.14. At 13,670 mi per year, the estimated savings are roughly $397 per year, or about $1,987 over five years.
The EV calculation uses the selected model-specific road and climate estimate. For the Lexus NX 350h Hybrid AWD, an official fuel-consumption figure is adjusted with a correction factor for the relevant test cycle. The calculation uses average prices in United States: $0.17/kWh for home electricity and $3.26/gal for fuel. Adjust the sliders to test your own mileage, prices and consumption.
Your driving profile
Charging cost
Charging time
Charging and fuel cost comparison
Trip cost
Does this car fit your daily routine?
EV as a power outlet (V2L)
Towing and roof load
Estimated home charger payback period
Estimated range in real-world conditions
Compare charging and fuel costs for this model
We have created dedicated comparison pages for this EV and selected petrol, diesel and hybrid rivals. The calculations use the EV's selected road-and-climate consumption estimate, an adjusted fuel-consumption estimate for the rival, and electricity and fuel prices for the selected market. Each page opens the calculator with that model pair preselected:
How this calculator works
EV consumption and range are calculated using model-specific estimates for different driving and climate conditions. The official WLTP range is shown for reference where available, but the calculations are based on the selected scenario rather than directly on the WLTP value.
The home-charging calculation includes an estimated 10% charging loss. No additional loss factor is currently applied to public DC charging. Electricity and fuel prices are market averages with a visible update date, and all prices, charging shares and mileage values can be adjusted with the sliders.
Fuel consumption for petrol, diesel and hybrid rivals is calculated from their official WLTP, EPA, NEDC or manufacturer figures using correction factors for the relevant test cycle. You can also replace the estimated consumption and fuel price with your own values.
All results are estimates. Weather, driving style, load, charging losses and local tariffs can change the actual result. The data behind this calculator is maintained and reviewed by the Elbil RADAR editorial team. If you spot an error, use the contact page and we will review it.